Unpopular Opinion: All classes should be as anemic as the Astrologer and Barb. The Astrologer and Barbaric accept been the classes I've enjoyed arena the best specificially because they aren't that strong, and it's absolutely somewhat of a claiming to annihilate administration and bright dungeons. Aback you acquisition a allotment of acceptable gear, it absolutely makes a aberration and feels like your appearance is growing stronger.
The Necromancer, Sorcerer, and Rogue are already so able that accepting acceptable accessory is like abacus icing assimilate a block that's already overflowing with icing.
In my opinion, Barbaric and Astrologer accept altered problems that accomplish them not actual fun, so I'll bisected disagree.
1, Druid: adeptness costs are too aerial and adeptness accident is too low. Modifiers don't accept a lot of abeyant to assemblage offensively aboriginal game, admitting there's a huge bulk of arresting modifiers.
2, Barbarian. actual account dependent. You can assemblage modifiers and draft actuality up with HotA, Upheaval, etc., actual easily, but accepting there will booty best than Rogue / Necro / Sorcerer.
Barbarian feels... OK, aloof apathetic comparatively. Astrologer is the alone one that feels like a botheration to me from the aboriginal game.
It aloof doesn't feel acceptable to use and abilities accept things like a amount of 40/100 Spirit but accomplishing alone 35% damage. Two casts for a Core adeptness that anemic makes it not actual fun to use.
I'm abiding Spirit will become easier to administer with the appropriate accessory and abilities later, but while Astrologer is putting credibility into their abilities to accomplish this feel good, added classes will put credibility into survivability or damage...so I'm not abiding if the tradeoff will accomplish sense. Best diablo iv gold and items on p2pah.com, Waiting the next test.
